Are You Talking to a Real Man or ChatGPT? Swipe Left to Find Out

Follow and share:

“Heartfelt” Opening Lines…By AI

According to a Business Insider survey, about 20% of men (ages 25–35) are now using ChatGPT or similar tools “to generate bios and tailored messages” on Tinder, Bumble, Hinge, and more. The payoff? 37% felt more confident, and 24% noticed improvement in their messaging game.

One self-described “Tinder veteran” reportedly used ChatGPT to write a love poem—about “climbing a tree” as a metaphor for messaging a 6-foot-tall match—and apparently “she ate that up”.

Seems like men have collectively decided: why search your soul for chemistry when you can just prompt AI?

💍 The “Engagement by Algorithm” Success Story

Enter Alexander Zhadan, a Moscow-based dev who had ChatGPT (or GPT‑2 originally) swipe right on 5,239 women, schedule 100+ dates… and eventually found his fiancée Karina.

“The program sounded like him… could even schedule in-person dates through his Google Calendar.”

He dialed it back eventually, confessed to Karina mid‑match—and she shrugged: “It’s okay when used in a rational way”—and now they’re engaged. Efficiency wins the day… and a ring.

Anxiety, Authenticity, or Laziness?

But hold on—before we all bow to our robot overlords, there’s a backlash brewing:

A Times essay warns that using AI “strips away authenticity,” with cheesy/formal lines that come off as deceptive.
On Reddit, flustered daters are calling it out: “I matched with this guy, and every single reply is straight up from ChatGPT…it’s so obvious. I’m mad I’m so mad.” Another confessed: “ChatGPT actually entertains women I message, I don’t. I’m too boring.”

So while AI might break the ice, it can also freeze the vibe when you actually have to pick up the phone—or show up without flowers.

Ethical Dilemma: Ghosting or Toasting?

Let’s be real: are we impressed or horrified when someone uses ChatGPT as their dating wingman?

Some see it as a fun hack to stand out in a sea of “Hey” and “What’s up?”
Others say it’s catfishing—fake personality, fake charm, fake you.
And platforms are already experimenting: Tinder’s own AI-flirt “Game Game” feature got cringed-out, failing to capture human nuance

Should You Swipe Right on AI Chatting?

In a nutshell:

Pros	Cons
Breaks the ice with wit and style	May feel robotic or formulaic
Boosts confidence—especially if you’re conversationally shy	Quite possibly unethical if undisclosed
Can book real dates more efficiently	Risks mismatched expectations on actual meet-up

So if your idea of romance is “let AI craft my first 3–5 texts,” congratulations—you’re ahead of the curve (and maybe in therapy). Just be ready to ditch the digital shtick before the first coffee or you’re left holding the bouquet you didn’t write.

Men are increasingly using ChatGPT to craft bios, icebreakers, and even schedule dates—and yes, some have found real matches and even fiancées thanks to it. But others are openly calling foul, and certain daters report getting ghosted the moment AI-era tone subsides. The age-old wisdom still applies: be real, or risk becoming the greatest Tinder novelty of 2025.

How Women Feel About AI Flirting

“AI texts feel scripted and fake”

A Times article nails the sentiment: AI-crafted lines—like cheesy pick‑ups or overly polished prose—strip away authenticity and leave women feeling catfished.

Reddit back up this experience:

“My god the bar is so low now… If I actually meet him for a date I’ll be able to quickly discern if his deep, thoughtful responses were authentic or not, but I can’t help but feel it’s AI.”

It’s like texting with a chatbot, not a human.

🚫 Deal-breaker for many

One woman in that thread confessed it was instant block when she realized it was AI-generated:

“This is a good idea, I’m going to try this… But if you have to wonder if they’re using AI to respond they probably are.” … “That would be an automatic dealbreaker for me.”

For them, AI replies = lazy, deceptive, or straight-up annoying.

“Fine if used sparingly — but tell me!”

In a more balanced take from Mashable, some women don’t mind AI opening lines—”if it helps move things along”—as long as it’s used sparingly and doesn’t replace genuine conversation.

One even said:

“I’d be fine with someone using AI to help craft a breakup text… only if we’d been on fewer than three dates. After that, I’d be insulted.

Bottom line: initial assistance is cute, but ongoing reliance is a turn‑off.

🌱 The “Artificial Intimacy” pitfall

Research on “artificial intimacy” suggests overly polished AI chat can create emotional mimicry—but it risks leaving recipients feeling disconnected or manipulated—especially if authenticity is missing .

🧭 A middle ground?

Some apps (like Sydney’s “RIZZ”) are pitching AI in a coaching role—not replacing users, but giving them conversational boost. The key? Use it as a prompt or inspiration, not a substitute for real personality.

TL;DR

Red flag: Too-polished or robotic replies = major turn-off.
No judgment: A few AI prompts to spark convo? Many women don’t mind.
Honesty matters: Using AI is fine—if you’re upfront and eventually show your real self.

When women crave personality and connection, ChatGPT can’t fake being you. So if you’re gonna lean on AI, use it like training wheels—not the whole bike.